Currently one of the most comprehensive and useful views of humans' place in the cosmos. His explanations about the fungibility of pre-quantum potentials is fantastic. His theory of the power of "hard to vary explanations" is enlightening and very useful. He identifies knowledge, being accurate working models of the nature of the universe, as essential components of the cosmos, and humans' facility with knowledge as what makes them so special on the planet and in the grand scheme. While great, the book is weak in its lack of distinction between essentially subjective aspects of being and those objective features of the universe which science can access. He also doesn't clarify the important distinction between "designed" complex beings (including artifacts like computers) and "deeply derived" complex beings (like animals and people). Lacking this distinction I think he overestimates the achievability of a meaningful form of artificial intelligence, but even with this said the whole of the book seems to me to loudly suggest these important distinctions between the lines. Comprehensive, very readable, and extremely interesting, this book is a page turner and will occupy a spot among my "top shelf books" for many years I'm sure.
I borrowed it in hopes of learning a bit about quantum computing, but alas I learnt a lot about politics, philosophy, the process of science. All just about as satisfying as learning about quantum computing.
This book contains quite a mix of things from substantive quantum mechanics and physics, to history of science, philosophy, criticisms of various ideas and ways of thinking, a very nice dialogue between Socrates and Hermes. Excellent in parts. Makes one think but I found it both too long and too encompassing. Material might have worked best in 3 or 4 smaller more focused books.
No bullshit by a non-idiot. An entirely worthwhile read dealing mostly with modern(ist) epistemology. I felt some of his arguments were a bit sneaky, a good stimulus to critical thought, and I kept having these niggling doubts that Deutsch doesn't address sufficiently the nihilistic horror that was the 20th century (look, he took "the enlightenment" for his subject). I certainly appreciate his optimism and the key idea of intelligent creativity. Problems have solutions if the frame is found. In the future we will know more.
recom by economist
There are no age suitabilities for this title yet.
There are no summaries for this title yet.
There are no notices for this title yet.
There are no quotes for this title yet.